Communications in Humanities Research
- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences
Communications in Humanities Research
Vol. 16, 28 November 2023
Open
Access | Article
Reflecting Social Reproduction in Chinese Policy: Learning from Sweden Successful Practices to Promote Gender Equality in Social Reproduction
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
With the development of society, women have become more involved in paid work in the production sphere, but they still mainly perform unpaid domestic work in social reproduction. Women spend much more time on domestic work than men. This results in a double burden on women from work and family and creates the problem of unequal gender division of la-bour in social reproduction. In this case, the improvement of the paternity leave system can effectively promote the sharing of responsibilities between the two sexes in childcare activities, thus breaking the gender division of la-bour in social reproduction and alleviating the double pressure on women. Using the research method of comparative policy analysis, the article focuses on the desirability of the Swedish paternity leave system and compares it with the Chinese paternity leave system. The article then puts forward feasi-ble policy recommendations in light of China’s actual situation. The article finds that compared to Sweden, China’s paternity leave system has three ob-vious shortcomings: there is no national legislation providing for male-only paternity leave, paternity leave is often short and rigid, and the cost-burden model is unreasonable. After identifying these three problems, the article suggests that China should improve its paternity leave system in these three aspects: specifying a male quota in the national law, extending the length of paternity leave and increasing the flexibility of the leave method, and estab-lishing a cost-sharing model for society.
Keywords
social reproduction theory, domestic unpaid work, double burden, gender equality
References
1. Hochschild, A., & Machung, A. (2012). The second shift: Working families and the revolution at home. Penguin.
2. Bianchi, S. M., Milkie, M. A., Sayer, L. C., & Robinson, J. P. (2000). Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social forces, 79(1), 191-228.
3. Killewald, A., & Gough, M. (2010). Money isn’t everything: Wives’ earnings and housework time. Social science research, 39(6), 987-1003.
4. Braunstein, E., Bouhia, R., & Seguino, S. (2020). Social reproduction, gender equality and economic growth. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 44(1), 129-156.
5. Tong, X.. (1999). Social change and the history and trend of women’s employment in China. Women’s Studies Series (01), 38-41.
6. Tong, X and Zhou, Lvjun (2013). Balance between employment and family caregiving:A comparison based on gender and occupational position[J]. Xuehai,2013(02):72-77.
7. Chen, L., Fan, H., & Chu, L. (2020). The Double-Burden Effect: Does the Combination of Informal Care and Work Cause Adverse Health Outcomes Among Females in China?. Journal of Aging and Health, 32(9), 1222-1232.
8. Rai, S. M., Hoskyns, C., & Thomas, D. (2014). Depletion: The cost of social reproduction. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 16(1), 86-105.
9. Bhattacharya, T. (2017). Introduction. Mapping Social Reproduction Theory [w:] Social Reproduction Theory. Remapping Class, Recentring Oppression, ed. T. Bhattacharya, foreword L. Vogel.
10. Arruzza, C. (2016). Functionalist, determinist, reductionist: Social reproduction feminism and its critics. Science & Society, 80(1), 9-30.
11. Beneria, L. (1999). The enduring debate over unpaid labour. Int’l Lab. Rev., 138, 287.
12. Ferguson, S. (2016). Intersectionality and social-reproduction feminisms: Toward an integrative ontology. Historical Materialism, 24(2), 38-60.
13. Fraser, N. (2017). Feminism, capitalism and the cunning of history. In Citizenship rights (pp. 393-413). Routledge.
14. Munro, K. (2019). “Social reproduction theory,” social reproduction, and household production. Science & Society, 83(4), 451-468.
15. Hoskyns, C., & Rai, S. M. (2007). Recasting the global political economy: Counting women’s unpaid work. New political economy, 12(3), 297-317.
16. Laslett, B., & Brenner, J. (1989). Gender and social reproduction: Historical perspectives. Annual review of sociology, 15(1), 381-404.
17. Brenner, Johanna. (2000). Women and the Politics of Class. New York: Monthly Review.
18. Benería, L., Berik, G., & Floro, M. (2015). Gender, development and globalization: Economics as if all people mattered. Routledge.
19. Lamphere, L. (1987). From Working Daughters to Working Mothers. Ithaca, NY: Cor- nell Univ. Press.
20. Luxton, M. (1980). More than a labour of love: Three generations of women’s work in the home (Vol. 2). Canadian Scholars’ Press.
21. Luxton, M. (2006). Feminist political economy in Canada and the politics of social reproduction. Social reproduction: Feminist political economy challenges neo-liberalism, 11-4.
22. Smith, D. (1987). Women’s inequality and the family. See Gerstel & Gross 1987, pp. 23- 54.
23. Armstrong, J., Walby, S., and Strid, S. (2009). The gendered division of labour: how can we assess the quality of employment and care policy from a gender equality perspective?. Benefits: A Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 17(3), 263-275.
24. Federici, Silvia (2014). Caliban and the Witch : Women, the Body and Primitive Accumulation. 2nd rev. ed. Brooklyn, NY: Autonomedia, 2014. Print.
25. Dalla Costa, Mariarosa., and Selma James (1975). The Power of Women and the Subversion of the Community. 3rd ed. Bristol: Falling Wall Press Ltd. Print.
26. Federici, S. (1975). Wages against housework (pp. 187-194). Bristol: Falling Wall Press.
27. Vogel, L. (2013). Marxism and the oppression of women: Toward a unitary theory. Brill.
28. Charmes, J. (2006). A review of empirical evidence on time use in Africa from UN-sponsored surveys, in Blackden, C. M. and Wodon, Q. (eds), Gender, Time Use, and Poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa, World Bank Working Paper No. 73.
29. Budlender, D. (2008). ‘The Statistical Evidence on Care and Non-Care Work across Six Countries’, Gender and Development Programme Paper No. 4, UNRISD.
30. Kabeer, N. (2016). Gender equality, economic growth, and women’s agency: the “endless variety” and “monotonous similarity” of patriarchal constraints. Feminist Economics, 22(1), 295-321.
31. Zhao, Xiaobai (2022). Research on the legal system of paternity leave in China [D]. Lanzhou University.
32. Johansson, T. (2011). Fatherhood in transition: Paternity leave and changing masculinities. Journal of family communication, 11(3), 165-180.
33. Ellingsæter, Anne Lise and Leira, Arnlaug (2006). Introduction in Ellingsæter, AL; Leira A, eds. Politicising parenthood in Scandinavia. Gender relations in welfare states. Bristol: Policy Press, 1–18.
34. Eydal, Guðny Bjork (2005). Childcare policies of the Nordic welfare states: different paths to enable parents to earn and care? In: Pfau-Effinger, Birgit; Geissler, Birgit, eds. Care and social integration in European societies. Bristol: Policy Press: 153–173.
35. Haataja, A. (2009). Fathers’ use of paternity and parental leave in the Nordic countries.
36. Rostgaard, Tine (2002). Setting time aside for the father: father’s leave in Scandinavia. Community, Work and Family. 5 (3): 343–364.
37. Cowan Carolyn, and Philip Cowan. (1992). When partners become parents: The big life change for couples. New York: Basic Books.
38. Walzer, S. (1998). Thinking about the baby: Gender and transitions into parenthood (Vol. 105). Temple University Press.
39. Bobel, Chris. (2002). The paradox of natural mothering. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
40. Chodorow, Nancy. (1978). The reproduction of mothering: Psychoanalysis and the sociology of gender. Berkeley: University of California Press.
41. Miller, Tina. (2007). Is this what motherhood is all about? Weaving experiences and discourse through transition to first-time motherhood. Gender & Society 21:337-58.
42. Oakley, Ann. (1979). Becoming a mother. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
43. Allen, Sarah, and Alan Hawkins. (1999). Maternal gatekeeping: Mothers’ beliefs and behaviors that inhibit greater father involvement in family work. Journal of Marriage and Family 61:199-212.
44. Craig, Lyn, and Killian Mullan. (2011). How mothers and fathers share childcare: A cross-national time use comparison. American Sociological Review 76:834-61.
45. Coltrane, Scott. (1996). Family man: Fatherhood, housework, and gender equity. New York: Oxford University.
46. Ehrensaft, Diane. (1987). Parenting together: Men and women sharing the care of their children. New York: Free Press.
47. Gerson, Kathleen. (1993). No man’s land: Men’s changing commitment to family and work. New York: Basic Books.
48. Rehel, E. M. (2014). When dad stays home too: Pater- nity leave, gender, and parenting. Gender & Society, 28, 110–132.
49. Cabrera, N. J., Fagan, J., & Farrie, D. (2008). Explaining the long reach of fathers’ prenatal involvement on later paternal engagement. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 1094–1107.
50. Marsiglio, W., & Roy, K. (2012). Nurturing dads: Social initiatives for contemporary fatherhood. New York: Russell Sage.
51. Roggman, L. A., Boyce, L. K., Cook, G. A., & Cook, J. (2002). Getting dads involved: Predictors of father involvement in Early Head Start and with their children. Infant Mental Health Journal, 23, 62–78.
52. Haas, L., & Hwang, C. P. (2008). The impact of taking parental leave on fathers’ participation in childcare and relationships with children: Lessons from Sweden. Community, Work, and Fam- ily, 11, 85–104.
53. Huerta, M. C., Adema, W., Baxter, J., Han, W., Lausten, M., Lee, R., & Waldfo- gel, J. (2014). Fathers’ leave and fathers’ involvement: Evidence from four OECD countries. European Journal of Social Secu- rity, 16, 308–346.
54. Pragg, B., & Knoester, C. (2017). Parental leave usage among disadvantaged fathers. Journal of Family Issues, 38, 1157–1185.
55. Nepomnyaschy, L., & Waldfogel, J. (2007). Pater- nity leave and fathers’ involvement with their young children. Community, Work and Family, 10, 427–453.
56. Seward, R. R., Yeats, D. E., Amin, I., & DeWitt, A. (2006). Employment leave and fathers’ involvement with children. Men and Masculinities, 8, 405–427.
57. Pasley, K., Petren, R. E., & Fish, J. N. (2014). Use of identity theory to inform fathering scholarship. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 6, 298–318.
58. Rane, T. R., & McBride, B. A. (2000). Identity theory as a guide to understanding fathers’ involvement with their children. Journal of Family Issues, 21, 347–366.
59. Stryker, S. (1968). Identity salience and role per- formance: The relevance of symbolic interaction theory for family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 30, 558–564.
60. Petts, R. J., & Knoester, C. (2018). Paternity leave-taking and father engagement. Journal of Marriage and Family, 80(5), 1144-1162.
61. Tong, ShaoSu. (1994). Role Confusion and Women’s Way Out--A Review of the International Conference on “Contemporary Role Conflict Research of Working Women”. Zhejiang Journal (01).
62. Tong, X., Long, Y.. (2002). Reflection and Reconstruction--A Review of Research on Gender Division of Labor in China. Zhejiang Journal (04).
63. Shen Chonglin, Yang Shanhua, and Li Dong. (1999). Urban and Rural Families at the Turn of the Century. China Social Science Press. p91.
64. Third Survey on the Social Status of Chinese Women (2011). All-China Women’s Federation and National Bureau of Statistics. Available from: http://www.china.com.cn/zhibo/zhuanti/ch-xinwen/2011-10/21/content_23687810.htm (Accessed19 July 2023 ).
65. The world bank (2023). Labor force participation rate, female (% of female population ages 15+) (modeled ILO estimate). Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SL.TLF.CACT.FE.ZS (Accessed19 July 2023).
66. Yu, Zhilin (2022). Analysis of the current situation of division of labour in domestic work in China[J]. Co-operative Economy and Science and Technology,2022(23):84-87.
67. Liu Aiyu, Tong Xin, Fu Wei (2015). Gendered division of household chores in dual-income families:economic dependence, gender concepts, or emotional expression[J]. Society,2015,35(02):109-136.
68. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: an overview and guidelines. journal of business research, 104, 333-339.
69. Breuning, M. (2007). Foreign policy analysis: A comparative introduction. Springer.
70. Hofferbert, R. I., & Cingranelli, D. L. (1996). Public policy and administration: comparative policy analysis. A new handbook of political science, 593-609.
71. Radin, B. A., & Weimer, D. L. (2020). Compared to what? The multiple meanings of comparative policy analysis. Theory and Methods in Comparative Policy Analysis Studies, 43-58.
72. Li Chunxiu. (2022). Research on the legal system of paternity leave. Liaoning University.
73. Liu, S. N.. (2020). On the Improvement of the Legal System of Paternity Leave in China. China University of Mining and Technology.
74. Hu, Yukun. (2019). From “Velvet Daddy” to “Latte Daddy”-Institutional and conceptual changes of paid paternity leave in Sweden. Social Science Forum (05), 183-191.
75. Diesel. (2010). Swedish legal system against employment discrimination. China Labour (03), 28-30.
76. Fertility rate, total (births per woman) - Sweden(2022). United Nations Population Division. Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.TFRT.IN?locations=SE (Accessed 19 July 2023).
77. Guo, J. (2017). What is the Best Paid Parental Leave Arrangement to Promote Gender-Balanced Caregiving in the Home, and Gender Equality in the Workplace in New Zealand. NZWLJ, 1, 65.
78. Wang, Jian. (2022). From ‘Gender Difference’ to ‘Gender Neutrality’ to ‘Gender Reinvention’: Extraterritorial Experience of Parental Leave Legislation and Its Implications. Global Law Review (05), 147-162.
79. Guo, W. H.. (2022). Research on the legal system of maternity leave. Liaoning University.
80. Lamb, Michael. (2004). The role of the father in child development, 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
81. Lamb, M. E. (2010). How do fathers influence children’s development? Let me count the ways. In M.E. Lamb (Ed.), The role of the father in child development, 5th edition (1–26). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
82. Wells, M. B., & Bergnehr, D. (2014). Families and family policies in Sweden. Handbook of family policies across the globe, 91-107.
83. Your social security rights in Sweden (2022). European Commission. Available from: file:///Users/lily/Downloads/missoc-ssg-SE-2022-en.pdf (Accessed 19 July 2023).
84. Liang, JZ and Guo, ZG (2013). Fertility policy adjustment and China’s development [M]. Beijing:Social Science Literature Press,199-201.
85. How to reassure workers after the extension of maternity leave? (2022). Beijing Municipal Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference. Available from: http://www.bjzx.gov.cn/ztzl/zxqh/zxh2022/mtgz202201/202201/t20220106_38357.html (Accessed 19 July 2023).
86. Qiu, Yumei and Tian, Mengmeng. (2014). Research on “paternity leave” system. Times Law (03), 63-72.
87. Pan, X. T.. (2021). Research on paternity leave system in China. Tianjin Normal University parenthood. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
88. Lamb, M. E., Chuang, S. C., & Hwang, C. P. (2004). Internal reliability, temporal stability, and correlates of individual differences in paternal involvement: A 15-year longitudinal study in Sweden. In R. D. Day & M. E. Lamb (Eds.), Conceptualizing and measuring father involvement (pp. 129–148). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
89. Ying, Jieqin. (2018). On the Establishment and Improvement of the Legal System of Parental Leave. East China University of Politics and Law.
90. Statistical Bulletin of the People’s Republic of China on National Economic and Social Development, 2021. (2022). National Bureau of Statistics of China. Available from: https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2022-02/28/content_5676015.htm (Accessed 19 July 2023).
Data Availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).
- Volume Title
- Proceedings of the International Conference on Global Politics and Socio-Humanities
- ISBN (Print)
- 978-1-83558-165-0
- ISBN (Online)
- 978-1-83558-166-7
- Published Date
- 28 November 2023
- Series
- Communications in Humanities Research
- ISSN (Print)
- 2753-7064
- ISSN (Online)
- 2753-7072
- DOI
- 10.54254/2753-7064/16/20230579
- Copyright
- 28 November 2023
- Open Access
- This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited