Communications in Humanities Research

- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences


Communications in Humanities Research

Vol. 25, 03 January 2024


Open Access | Article

Radical Feminism and Family Law: Addressing Gender Bias, Reforming, and Beyond

Yuxuan Wang * 1
1 University of British Columbia

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Communications in Humanities Research, Vol. 25, 81-92
Published 03 January 2024. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by EWA Publishing
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Citation Yuxuan Wang. Radical Feminism and Family Law: Addressing Gender Bias, Reforming, and Beyond. CHR (2024) Vol. 25: 81-92. DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/25/20231870.

Abstract

This research undertakes a comprehensive exploration of reproductive rights and abortion within the broader context of gender politics, with a keen emphasis on the influence of radical feminism. Reproductive rights, extending beyond mere health and medical concerns, intersect with societal, ethical, religious, and political dimensions. Through this lens, the study investigates global reproductive policies and the international legal stance on abortion. The ascendancy of radical feminism and its critiques against historically entrenched patriarchal structures form a core component of this discourse. The article further delves into the legal histories and controversies surrounding both reproductive and abortion rights, probing into their evolving legal frameworks, international regulations, and the multifaceted debates linked to their acceptability. Through the interplay of these elements, the research ultimately converges on the broader implications these topics have on global human rights, women’s socio-economic standings, and the fluid realm of gender dynamics. The overarching goal is to shed light on these intricate relationships, contributing to a more equitable and inclusive understanding of evolving gender politics.

Keywords

reproductive rights, abortion, radical feminism, human rights, legal reforms

References

1. United Nations. (2021). World Population Policies 2021: Policies related to fertility. https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/undesa_pd_2021_wpp-fertility_policies.pdf

2. Rebouché, R. (2016). Abortion Rights as Human Rights. Social & Legal Studies, 25(6), 765–782. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663916668391

3. World Health Organization. (2021, November 25). Abortion. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/abortion

4. Kabeer, N. (1999). Resources, Agency, achievements: Reflections on the measurement of Women’s empowerment. Development and Change, 30(3), 435–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00125

5. MacKinnon, C. A. (1989). Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. Harvard University Press. [5] Duriesmith,

6. D., & Meger, S. (2020). Returning to the root: Radical feminist thought and feminist theories of International Relations. Review of International Studies, 46(3), 357-375. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210520000133

7. Collier, R. (2017). Reports of coerced sterilization of indigenous women in Canada mirrors shameful past. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 189(33). https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1095471

8. UNFPA. (2020). Ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive health and rights. https://www.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/UNFPA-SDG561562Combined-v4.15.pdf

9. Nash, E., & Ephross, P. (2022, June 22). State Policy Trends at Midyear 2022: With Roe About to Be Overturned, Some States Double Down on Abortion Restrictions. Guttmacher Institute. https://www.guttmacher.org/article/2022/06/state-policy-trends-midyear-2022-roe-about-be-overturned-some-states-double-down

10. Reidy, A. (2020, May 26). Ireland Votes Overwhelmingly to Repeal Abortion Ban. Human Rights Watch. https://www.hrw.org/news/2018/05/26/ireland-votes-overwhelmingly-repeal-abortion-ban

11. Ross, L. J., & Solinger, R. (2017). Reproductive Justice: An Introduction (1st ed.). University of California Press.

12. Cook, R. J., & Dickens, B. M. (1999). Human rights and abortion laws. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 65(1), 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-7292(99)00028-4

13. Berer, M. (2017). Abortion Law and Policy Around the World: In Search of Decriminalization. Health and Human Rights, 19(1), 13–27.

14. O’Donnell, K. S. (2017). Reproducing Jane: Abortion stories and women’s political histories. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 43(1), 77–96. https://doi.org/10.1086/692444

15. Ramos, S., Keefe-Oates, B., Romero, M., Ramon Michel, A., Krause, M., Gerdts, C., & Yamin, A. E. (2023). Step by step in Argentina: Putting abortion rights into practice. International Journal of Women’s Health, 15, 1003–1015. https://doi.org/10.2147/ijwh.s412975

16. Foster, D. G., Biggs, M. A., Ralph, L., Gerdts, C., Roberts, S., & Glymour, M. M. (2018). Socioeconomic Outcomes of Women Who Receive and Women Who Are Denied Wanted Abortions in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 108(3), 407–413. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2017.304247

17. Mongoven, A. (2007). [Review of the book Sacred Rights: The Case for Contraception and Abortion in World Religions by D. C. Maguire]. Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics, 27(1), 307–309. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23561875

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:

1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.

2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.

3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).

Volume Title
Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies
ISBN (Print)
978-1-83558-253-4
ISBN (Online)
978-1-83558-254-1
Published Date
03 January 2024
Series
Communications in Humanities Research
ISSN (Print)
2753-7064
ISSN (Online)
2753-7072
DOI
10.54254/2753-7064/25/20231870
Copyright
03 January 2024
Open Access
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited

Copyright © 2023 EWA Publishing. Unless Otherwise Stated