Communications in Humanities Research
- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences
Communications in Humanities Research
Vol. 28, 19 April 2024
Open
Access | Article
The Case Analysis of Anita Hill and Christine Blasey Ford: The Reason of the Metoo Movement’s Success
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
The #Metoo movement, an anti-sexual harassment campaign, has been among the most effective campaigns in the past five years. To show how the #MeToo movement has the potential to change public perceptions of and responses to sexual harassment and assault, the paper will compare and contrast two cases, Anita Hill v. Clarence Thomas and Christine Blasey Ford v. Brett Kavanaugh. Additionally, this essay used Baker's theory to show that there are typically multiple forms of harassment present but that women may feel ashamed of sexual violence and are hesitant to speak out about it. Another issue is that in a society where men predominate, few victims of harassment by influential people dare to come out. The #MeToo movement is thriving, according to this essay's argument, because it encourages people to share their experiences in a safe setting and puts pressure on institutions to deal with sexual misconduct. Additionally, it increases public awareness of sexual assault and harassment. An essential and powerful viewpoint on women's awakening may be found in #Metoo.
Keywords
#Metoo, sexual harassment, Anita Hill, Christine Blasey Ford
References
1. Kenny, M.C, and McEachern, A.G. (October 2000) “Racial, Ethnic, and Cultural Factors of Childhood Sexual Abuse,” Clinical Psychology Review 20, no. 7: 905–22.
2. Andrea Plaid, (October 15, 2021). “‘me too.’ Matures As a Movement.” https://majicatl.com/2717105/me-too-matures-as-a-movement/
3. Leopold, J., Jason R.L., Ifeyimika O.O., and Myrtle P.B. (October 2, 2019) “The Hashtag Heard Round the World: How #MeToo Did What Laws Did Not.” Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal 40, no. 4: 461-476.
4. Jonas, J.R., April B., Claire P., and Aleksander G. (2018) “Sexism, Rape Myths and Feminist Identification Explain Gender Differences in Attitudes toward the #metoo Social Media Campaign in Two Countries.” Media Psychology 22, no. 5: 818-843.
5. Szekeres, H., Shuman, E., Saguy, T. (2020) “Views of Sexual Assault Following #MeToo: The Role of Gender and Individual Differences.” Personality and Individual Differences 166, 110203.
6. Westwood, R., (January 16, 2018). “Why Some Women Can’t Get behind #metoo - but Wouldn’t Dare Admit It”. https://chatelaine.com/news/metoo-backlash/.
7. Speeches-USA. (May 18, 2023) “Anita Hill “testimony to Senate Judiciary Committee” transcript” http://www.speeches-usa.com/Transcripts/anita_hill-testimony.html.
8. Baker, C.N., Szal R., Fontes, L.A., Zimbalist, A. (May 18, 2023) “Carrie N. Baker, Author at Ms. Magazine.” https://msmagazine.com/author/carriebaker/.
9. Baker, C.N. (2007) "Sexual Harassment" Study of Women and Gender: Faculty Publications. Smith College, Northampton, MA.
10. Eloise Salholz et al., “Dividing Lines,” Newsweek, Oct. 28, 1991, p. 25.
11. Jacobs Julia, (September 20, 2018). Anita Hill's testimony and other key moments from the Clarence Thomas Hearings. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/20/us/politics/anita-hill-testimony-clarence-thomas.html.
12. Edwards Haley Sweetland, (October 04, 2018). https://time.com/5415027/christine-blasey-ford-testimony/.
13. Cornish Audie, Zamora Karen, Dorning Courtney, (October 07, 2021). In a new podcast, Anita Hill and Christine Blasey Ford Converse for the 1st time. https://www.npr.org/2021/10/07/1044132412/in-a-new-podcast-anita-hill-and-christine-blasey-ford-converse-for-the-1st-time.
14. Handy, J. (January 10, 2006) “Sexual Harassment in Small-Town New Zealand: A Qualitative Study of Three Contrasting Organizations.” Gender, Work and Organization 13, no. 1: 1-24.
15. Mackinnon Catharine A., (February 05, 2018). #MeToo has done what the law could not. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/04/opinion/metoo-law-legal-system.html
16. Quan-Haase, A., and Young, A. L. (September 14, 2010). Uses and Gratifications of Social Media: A Comparison of Facebook and Instant Messaging. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30(5), 350–361.
Data Availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).
- Volume Title
- Proceedings of the International Conference on Global Politics and Socio-Humanities
- ISBN (Print)
- 978-1-83558-363-0
- ISBN (Online)
- 978-1-83558-364-7
- Published Date
- 19 April 2024
- Series
- Communications in Humanities Research
- ISSN (Print)
- 2753-7064
- ISSN (Online)
- 2753-7072
- DOI
- 10.54254/2753-7064/28/20230025
- Copyright
- 19 April 2024
- Open Access
- This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited