Communications in Humanities Research

- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences


Communications in Humanities Research

Vol. 5, 14 September 2023


Open Access | Article

Analysis the Nature of Logic: The Distinctions Between Logic and Mathematics

Hanshi Wang * 1
1 Lancaster University

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Communications in Humanities Research, Vol. 5, 417-422
Published 14 September 2023. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by EWA Publishing
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Citation Hanshi Wang. Analysis the Nature of Logic: The Distinctions Between Logic and Mathematics. CHR (2023) Vol. 5: 417-422. DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/5/20230343.

Abstract

The paper aims to explore the distinctions between logic and mathematics. Logic and mathematics have always been important branches of human knowledge, closely related in many ways and with far-reaching consequences in areas such as science, technology and philosophy. Although logic and mathematics have much in common in terms of necessity, universality, a priori and a high degree of abstraction, leading to the belief that the two fields of study are identical, they are essentially two very different disciplines. While they do appear very similar owing to their universal necessity and independence from temporal and spatial constraints, logic and mathematics are, in essence, two very distinct disciplines. They can be strictly differentiated based on their focus and epistemological perspectives. This paper will first explain the fundamental concepts of mathematics and logic, then delve into the two main differences between logic and mathematics, and finally, point out the limitations in the study of mathematics and logic.

Keywords

Philosophy of Logic, Philosophy of Math, Kant, a priori knowledge

References

1. Hodges, W. (2013). Logic and Computation. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2013 Edition) (p. 45). Stanford University.

2. Carnielli, W., Coniglio, M. E., & Marcos, J. (2016). Logics of Formal Inconsistency. In D. M. Gabbay, J. Woods, & A. Kanamori (Eds.), Handbook of the History of Logic (Vol. 14, pp. 109-113). Elsevier.

3. Smith, P. (2014). An Introduction to Gödel's Theorems (pp. 212-216). Cambridge University Press.

4. Rosen, G. (2015). Logical Pluralism and Mathematics. Philosophia Mathematica, 23(1), 55-75.

5. Awodey, S. (2017). Category Theory and Type Theory. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, 23(1), 20-34.

6. Ferreirós, J. (2018). Gödel, Turing, and the Confluence of Logic, Mathematics, and Computation. In B. van Kerkhove (Ed.), New Directions for the Philosophy of Mathematics (pp. 71-85). Springer.

7. Whitehead, A. N., & Russell, B. (1910). Principia Mathematica (Vol. 1, p. 5). Cambridge University Press.

8. Priest, G. (2017). Logical disputes and the a priori. Logique et Analyse, 60(239), 251-265.

9. Gabbay, D. M., & Woods, J. (2015). The reach of abduction: Insight and trial. In D. M. Gabbay & J. Woods (Eds.), Handbook of the History of Logic (Vol. 2, pp. 33-47). Elsevier.

10. Bennett, J. (2010). Logic. In R. Kempson, T. Fernando, & N. Asher (Eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Language (pp. 97-108). Wiley-Blackwell.

11. Ernest, P. (2016). The Philosophy of Mathematics Education: An Overview. In J. Nagata (Ed.), Philosophy of Mathematics: Theory and Practice (pp. 5-95). Springer.

12. Coppin, B. (2014). Discrete mathematics: An introduction to proofs and combinatorics. CRC Press. 3-5

13. Smith, D. E. (2014). A Source Book in Mathematics. New York, NY: Dover Publications. 25-65.

14. Immanuel, K. (1855). Critique of pure reason.

15. Shabel, Lisa, "Kant's Philosophy of Mathematics", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2017 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), Retrieved from: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/kant-mathematics/.

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:

1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.

2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.

3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).

Volume Title
Proceedings of the International Conference on Social Psychology and Humanity Studies
ISBN (Print)
978-1-83558-003-5
ISBN (Online)
978-1-83558-004-2
Published Date
14 September 2023
Series
Communications in Humanities Research
ISSN (Print)
2753-7064
ISSN (Online)
2753-7072
DOI
10.54254/2753-7064/5/20230343
Copyright
14 September 2023
Open Access
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited

Copyright © 2023 EWA Publishing. Unless Otherwise Stated