Communications in Humanities Research
- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences
Vol. 19, 07 December 2023
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Social media has become one of the most influential forces in the world today. Its rapid development speed, large user group, and robust interactive characteristics have profoundly changed people’s way of life and thinking. However, like two sides of the same coin, social media is quietly spreading the seeds of gender opposition. In the vast world of social media, the spread of gender antagonism takes many forms. First, the frequent gender stereotypes and sexist comments on social media create fixed stereotypes about gender roles. Such gender stereotypes limit perceptions and hinder the achievement of gender equality. Second, gender-antagonistic rhetoric and controversy on social media often spark heated debates and divisions. Many social topics, such as gender equality and gender identity, have become the focus of heated discussions on social media. However, due to heated rhetoric and entrenched positions, social media often becomes a hotbed of conflict and confrontation, hindering communication and understanding between genders. In response to the above questions, this paper focuses on the prioritization of social media on the width and breadth of gender antagonism through the subjects’ test of the awareness and communication impact of gender opposition in different places.
social media, gender antagonism conflict, Internet sexism, gender equality
1. Zhuravskaya, E., Petrova, M., & Enikolopov, R. (2020). Political effects of the internet and social media. Annual review of economics, 12, 415-438.
2. del Fresno García, M., Daly, A. J., & Segado Sanchez-Cabezudo, S. (2016). Identifying the new Influences in the Internet Era: Social Media and Social Network Analysis. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas, (153).
3. Capriotti, P. (2011). Communicating corporate social responsibility through the internet and social media. The handbook of communication and corporate social responsibility, 358-378.
4. Lodhia, S., & Stone, G. (2017). Integrated reporting in an internet and social media communication environment: conceptual insights. Australian Accounting Review, 27(1), 17-33.
5. Ahmed, S., & Madrid-Morales, D. (2021). Is it still a man’s world? Social media news use and gender inequality in online political engagement. Information, Communication & Society, 24(3), 381-399.
6. Suzor, N., Dragiewicz, M., Harris, B., Gillett, R., Burgess, J., & Van Geelen, T. (2019). Human rights by design: The responsibilities of social media platforms to address gender‐based violence online. Policy & Internet, 11(1), 84-103.
7. Zhang, C., Sun, J., Zhu, X., & Fang, Y. (2010). Privacy and security for online social networks: challenges and opportunities. IEEE network, 24(4), 13-18.
8. Alemany, J., Val, E. D., & García-Fornes, A. (2022). A review of privacy decision-making mechanisms in online social networks. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 55(2), 1-32.
9. Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2002). Behavior online: Does anonymous computer communication reduce gender inequality?. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(8), 1073-1083.
10. Fox, J., Cruz, C., & Lee, J. Y. (2015). Perpetuating online sexism offline: Anonymity, interactivity, and the effects of sexist hashtags on social media. Computers in human behavior, 52, 436-442.
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).