Communications in Humanities Research
- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences
Vol. 5, 14 September 2023
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Aristotle’s Theory of Eudemonia is based on a profound perception of humanity. This theory is consistently practical for ordinary people, albeit in discussions about happiness and its components or explanations of varying lifestyles. Aristotle’s conception can be used to achieve a realistic ‘the best life’, which largely contrasts other eudemonic theories that can only realistically be applied by philosophical or divine individuals. In this essay, it will be argued that self-interest and other concerning factors exist with Aristotle’s theory, even though Aristotle himself never refuted the claim that his theory is profoundly egoistic. The self-interested aspect of Aristotelian theory is only relevant to how individuals perceive humans in general. Nonetheless, other concerns (such as how individuals treat others and the outcomes of their actions) are legitimate. Aristotle’s most significant achievement in this field was his promotion of virtue as a means of resolving any potential conflict between individuals’ personal interests and the outside world.
altruism, egoism, eudemonia, happiness
1. Aristotle, Rowe, C. J., & Broadie, S. (2020). Nicomachean ethics (S. Broadie,Ed.). Oxford University Press.
2. West, M. L. Martin L. (1971). Early Greek philosophy and the Orient. Clarendon Press.
3. URMSON, J. O. (1973). Aristotle’s Doctrine of the Mean. American Philosophical Quarterly (Oxford), 10(3): 223-230.
4. Jiyuan Yu. (2001). Aristotle on “Eudaimonia”: after Plato’s “Republic.” History of Philosophy Quarterly, 18(2), 115-138.
5. WHITE, N. (1995). Conflicting Parts of Happiness in Aristotle’s Ethics. Ethics, 105(2): 258-283.
6. Wolf, S. (1997). Happiness and Meaning: Two Aspects of the Good Life. Social Philosophy & Policy, 14(1): 207-225.
7. Annas, J. (1995). The Morality of Happiness. Oxford University Press.
8. KAHN, C. H. (1981). Aristotle and Altruism. Mind, XC (357): 20-40.
9. Hume, D. (1751). An enquiry concerning the principles of morals. By David Hume, Esq. In Eighteenth Century, Collections Online. printed for A. Millar, over-against Catherine-Street in the Strand.
10. Anthony Carreras. (2012). ARISTOTLE ON OTHER-SELFHOOD AND RECIPROCAL SHAPING. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 29(4): 319-336.
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).