Communications in Humanities Research

- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences


Communications in Humanities Research

Vol. 13, 20 November 2023


Open Access | Article

Examining the Morality of the U.S. Atomic Bombings: Strategic Necessity or Controversial Decision?

Yuyang Gao * 1
1 Glenelg Country School

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Communications in Humanities Research, Vol. 13, 95-99
Published 20 November 2023. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by EWA Publishing
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Citation Yuyang Gao. Examining the Morality of the U.S. Atomic Bombings: Strategic Necessity or Controversial Decision?. CHR (2023) Vol. 13: 95-99. DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/13/20230247.

Abstract

The morality of the two atomic bombings conducted by the United States on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki has long raised contention among both strategists and the general public. This paper discusses the strategic context of World War II’s Pacific theater and proposes that despite the unprecedented “cruelty” casted on Hiroshima and Nagasaki by atomic weapons, the bombs were dropped out of the strategic necessity to bring a swift end to the war. By reviewing the diaries of key commanders, the U.S. Army’s reports and forecasts of a land invasion of Japan, and account of Japanese resilience and unfathomable refusal to surrender under conventional circumstances, this study demonstrates that by forcing an early Japanese surrender, the atomic attacks obviated a land invasion of Japan, which would have inflicted much heavier casualties and thus provide the moral underpinnings of the atomic weapon attacks.

Keywords

morality, U.S. atomic bombing, strategic necessity, nuclear controversy

References

1. Giangreco, D.M. (1997) “Casualty Projection for the U.S. Invasion of Japan, 1945-1946: Planning and Policy Implications.” Journal of Military History. 61: 521-82.

2. Bernstein, Barton J. (1995) “The Atomic Bombings Reconsidered”. Foreign Affairs, Vol. 74. No.1 pp 135-52.

3. United States Strategic Bombing Survey, Summary Report: Pacific War (1946). Washington Post, January 28 1947.

4. Wilson, Ward (2013). “The Bomb Didn’t Beat Japan…Stalin Did.” Foreignpolicy.com. Retrieved December 3 2019. https://foreignpolicy.com/2013/05/30/the-bomb-didn’t beat-japan-stalin-did/

5. Roberts, Michael Lee (2005). “Ghost of a Nation: Totalitarian Spirit and Literary Mind of WWII Germany and Japan.” University of California, Berkeley.

6. Stimson, Henry L (1947). “The Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb”. The Infantry Journal. Vol 60. No. 3, pp 35-41.

7. Office of the Historian, Bureau of Public Affairs, United States Department of State. (n.d.). Foreign relations of the United States diplomatic papers: The Conference of Berlin (The Potsdam Conference), 1945, vol. II, p. 1382.

8. Kawai, K. (1950). Mokusatsu, Japan’s Response to the Potsdam Declaration. Pacific Historical Review, 19(4), 409-414. doi:10.2307/3635822

9. Oppenheimer, J. Robert (1945). “Recommendations on the Immediate Use of Nuclear Weapons.” https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu//nukevault/ebb525-The-Atomic-Bomb-and the-End-of-World-War-II/documents/025.pdf

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:

1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.

2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.

3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).

Volume Title
Proceedings of the International Conference on Global Politics and Socio-Humanities
ISBN (Print)
978-1-83558-115-5
ISBN (Online)
978-1-83558-116-2
Published Date
20 November 2023
Series
Communications in Humanities Research
ISSN (Print)
2753-7064
ISSN (Online)
2753-7072
DOI
10.54254/2753-7064/13/20230247
Copyright
20 November 2023
Open Access
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited

Copyright © 2023 EWA Publishing. Unless Otherwise Stated