Communications in Humanities Research
- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences
Vol. 8, 31 October 2023
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Today’s teenagers, as the new generation most susceptible to the influence of the internet, use their phones very frequently, and participating in the online world has become the main theme of their lives. Online platforms have become the trigger for adolescent psychological disorders. Secondly, teenagers may experience feelings of jealousy, comparison, and inferiority when using these media. However, research has also found that teenagers who love sports and life are less likely to suffer from digital depression, and they can face this series of negative emotions with an optimistic and positive attitude. Therefore, the author would like to know if there is a difference in the degree of harm suffered by extroverts and introverts when receiving negative reviews on social media, and its magnitude. Hoping that through this study, teenagers can learn how to alleviate negative emotions caused by the internet and reduce the risk of depression. The method used will be an experiment, and the author will imitate the method in the article Why Do Adolescents Receive Negative Feedback And Who Is Most At Risk?: using the modified NEO-FFI to focus on the basic features, language features, and interactive features of users’ published content, and infer whether their personality is extraversion or neuroobjectism in Big Five. The expected experimental result is that people with higher scores for extroversion generally have fewer negative emotions than those with higher scores for introversion, and the degree of difference between them will intensify over time.
teenagers, social media, negative emotions, the difference between extroverts and introverts
1. Zhou, Z., Xu, K. & Zhao, J. (2018) Extroverts tweet differently from introverts in Weibo. EPJ Data Sci. 7, 18. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-018-0146-8
2. Markus, A.,& Caroline, M.,&Timo, G. ( 2020 ). Are Social Media Ruining Our Lives? A Review of Meta-Analytic Evidence. Review of General Psychology 2020, Vol. 24(1) 60–74.
3. Lutz, S., & Schneider, F. M. (2020). Is receiving Dislikes in social media still better than being ignored? The effects of ostracism and rejection on need threat and coping responses online. Media Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2020.1799409
4. Sumer S, V. et al, (2022) Social Media Sensitivity. Available online: https://psyarxiv.com/yfp45
5. Koutamanis, M.,&Vossen, H.G.M.,&Valkenburg, P.M. (2015). Adolescents’ Comments in Social media: Why Do Adolescents Receive Negative Feedback and Who Is Most at risk? Computers in Human Behavior, [online] 53(1), pp.486–494. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.016.
6. Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., & Larsen, R. J. (2003). Measuring positive emotions. In S. J. Lopez & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Positive psychological assessment: A handbook of models and measures (pp. 201–218). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10612-013
7. Leslie, R., MSc. (2019) What is the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule? (PANAS) Available online: https://positivepsychology.com/positive-and-negative-affect-schedule-panas/
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).