Communications in Humanities Research
- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences
Vol. 23, 20 December 2023
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This paper shows how the media accomplishes its goals through the language and structure of the article about the Spy Balloon Incident. The analytical process is discussed from agenda-setting theory, Framing theory, and Priming theory, showing the underlying logic of the media and how they increase the hatred of the people of two countries towards each other's country through the spy balloon incident. With this thesis, the paper hope to make readers realize that the media is not necessarily presenting the real facts, but instead may be leading them to think what the polity or consortium behind the media wants them to think. This paper is different from the previous ones because it takes examples from the mainstream media outlets in two separate countries, rather than just looking at media outlets in a single country alone since they might work for the same polity and consortium, which means they have the same interest, and truth will not be revealed to people. This gives a more comprehensive perspective and logical integrity since it considers the issue from opposing sides. Unsurprisingly, the media are leading the crowd by adjusting the language and structure of their paragraphs.
Media, Politics, public, animosity
1. Baum, M. A., & Groeling, T. (2008). New Media and the Polarization of American Political Discourse. Political Communication, 25(4), 345–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600802426965
2. Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, Agenda Setting, and Priming: The Evolution of Three Media Effects Models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9–20.
3. Wilson, A. E., Parker, V. A., & Feinberg, M. (2020). Polarization in the contemporary political and media landscape. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34(2352-1546), 223–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.07.005
4. Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, Agenda Setting, and Priming: The Evolution of Three Media Effects Models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9–20.
5. de Vreese, C. (2005). News framing: Theory and typology. Identifying Information and Tenor in Texts, 13(1), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1075/idjdd.13.1.06vre
6. Priming theory. (2013). Encyclopedia of Media Violence. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452299655.n114
7. Xiao Xiao. (2023, July 18). Xinhua Times Commentary: Behind "De-Risk" is American Hegemony Anxiety - Beware of the rhetorical trap of "De-Risk", the third in a series of comments. News.cctv.com. https://news.cctv.com/2023/07/18/ARTI121gkaJqKw4HgcSFDbZJ230718.shtml
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).