Communications in Humanities Research

- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences


Communications in Humanities Research

Vol. 21, 07 December 2023


Open Access | Article

An Experimental Phonetic Study on “Discontinuity-Continuity” Effects of Chinese Prosodic Boundaries at Different Levels under the Influence of Focus in Different Positions

Junjie Zhang * 1
1 East China Normal University

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Communications in Humanities Research, Vol. 21, 120-131
Published 07 December 2023. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by EWA Publishing
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Citation Junjie Zhang. An Experimental Phonetic Study on “Discontinuity-Continuity” Effects of Chinese Prosodic Boundaries at Different Levels under the Influence of Focus in Different Positions. CHR (2023) Vol. 21: 120-131. DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/21/20231436.

Abstract

The production of fluent speech in Mandarin requires the modulation of both discontinuity and continuity effects, with prosodic boundaries and focus stress serving as crucial control factors. Previous research has focused on the acoustic properties of focus which is independent of prosodic boundaries. In this study, whether different focus positions can affect the discontinuity-continuity effects at prosodic boundaries of distinct levels would be investigated. The results of acoustic analysis reveal the following findings: (1) The discontinuity effect is mainly influenced by the boundary level types, while the continuity effect is primarily influenced by the focus position; (2) When the focus is positioned before or after the prosodic boundary, the focus context tends to weaken the control of the boundary level over the discontinuity and continuity effects. When the focus coincides with the boundary or is at the sentence-final position, the focus context tends to enhance the control of the boundary level over the discontinuity and continuity effects; (3) Focus and the prosodic hierarchy are two independent encoding systems, each with its own autonomy. However, both systems share prosodic resources in speech production, leading to cooperation and competition between the two to achieve a balanced intonational state. The impact of different focus positions in natural speech on the “discontinuity-continuity” effects at different levels of prosodic boundaries in natural speech highlights this inherent contradiction.

Keywords

focus, prosodic boundaries, discontinuity-continuity effects, Mandarin

References

1. Frazier, L., Clifton, C., & Carlson, K. (2004). Don’t break, or do: Prosodic boundary preferences. Lingua, 114 (1), 3–27.

2. Holzgrefe-Lang. J., Wellmann, C., Petrone, C., & Räling, R. (2016). How pitch change and final lengthening cue boundary perception in German: Converging evidence from ERPs and prosodic judgements. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(7), 904–920.

3. Frazier, L., Carlson, K., & Clifton, C. (2006). Prosodic phrasing is central to language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(6), 244–249.

4. Li.A.J. (2002). Acoustic representation of prosodic features in Mandarin dialogue [J]. Chinese, (06): 525-535 + 575.

5. Yin.Z.G.(2020). Re-discussion on the acoustic characteristics and formation mechanism of prosodic boundary [J]. Chinese Journal of Phonetics, (01): 38-50.

6. Qian.Y., Chu.M. & Pan.W.Y. (2001). Acoustic Analysis of Prosodic Unit Boundary in Mandarin [C]. //Proceedings of the Fifth National Conference on Modern Phonetics. Beijing: Chinese Information Society of China: 70-74.

7. Xiong.Z.Y.(2003). Acoustic Phonetics Study of Boundary Features of Prosodic Units [J]. Language Application, (02) : 116-121.

8. Halliday. M. (1967). Notes on transitivity and theme in English. Journal of Linguistics, 3:199-244.

9. Wang.Y.J., Chu.M., He.L. (2006). A preliminary experimental study on the distribution’of Chinese focus stress and semantic stress [J]. Global Chinese teaching. (02):8698+3.

10. Chen Y.Y. (2006). Durational adjustment under corrective focus in Standard Chinese[J]. Journal of Phonetics, 34(2):176-201.

11. Wang.B, Xu.Y, Ding.Q.F. (2017). Interactive prosodic marking of focus, boundary and newness in Mandarin. Phonetica, 75: 24—56.

12. Lin.M.C. (2012). Chinese Focus Accent and Functional Mood and Their Features [J]. Chinese Journal of Phonetics, 3: 13-28.

13. Liu.L., Wang.B. (2020). The influence of boundary strength on the realization of focus [J]. Acoustic Journal,45 (03): 289-298.

14. Qin.P.(2021). Intonation evidence for the distinction between information focus and contrastive focus in Chinese [J]. Contemporary Linguistics, 23 ( 01 ) : 74-86.

15. Li.Y., Lu.Y.C., Xu.X.Y., Tao.J.H. (2011). The influence of prosodic hierarchy and tone combination on stress perception in continuous speech [J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Natural Science Edition), 51 (09 ) : 1239-1243 + 1248.

16. Xu Y. (2013). Prosody Pro — A tool for large-scale systematic prosody analysis. In: Proceedings of Gools and resources for the Analysis of Speech Prosody, Aix-en-Provence, France. 7—10X.

17. Team R C. Version 4.2.2. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 2023.(03).

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:

1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.

2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.

3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).

Volume Title
Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies
ISBN (Print)
978-1-83558-185-8
ISBN (Online)
978-1-83558-186-5
Published Date
07 December 2023
Series
Communications in Humanities Research
ISSN (Print)
2753-7064
ISSN (Online)
2753-7072
DOI
10.54254/2753-7064/21/20231436
Copyright
07 December 2023
Open Access
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited

Copyright © 2023 EWA Publishing. Unless Otherwise Stated