Communications in Humanities Research
- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences
Communications in Humanities Research
Vol. 12, 20 November 2023
Open
Access | Article
Comparison Between Animal Communication and Language
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Language is a structured system that consists of grammar and vocabulary. Although animals communicate with each other, it has remained unsettled that whether animals use language. As Pearce concluded four main elements of language (arbitrariness of units, semanticity, displacement and productivity), this paper aims to evaluate animal communication according to these criteria and figure out their ability to learn language by studying the experiments conducted by scientists before. As a result, this paper found that animal communication met the criterion of semanticity, but failed to meet other criteria, especially the criterion of displacement and productivity, and it is very hard to teach them language. It is argued that they showed no evidence of using language even after they were taught some elements of it. The conclusion indicated that animals do not have language considering the evidence drawn from the studies before. However, it is also suggested that further studies are needed to find a better way to study animal communication and more suitable criteria for them. Signs also showed that animals may develop language referring to these criteria in the future.
Keywords
animal communication, language, arbitrariness of units, semanticity, displacement, productivity
References
1. Laidre, M. E. (2008) “Book review: The simian tongue: The long debate about animal language,” American Journal of Human Biology, vol. 20, no. 6, doi: 10.1002/ajhb.20829.
2. Hauser, M. D., and Tecumseh Fitch, W. (2010) “What Are the Uniquely Human Components of the Language Faculty?,” in Language Evolution, doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199244843.003.0009.
3. Miller, N., Oldham, G., and Pinker, S. (1994) “The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language,” Antioch Rev, vol. 52, no. 3, doi: 10.2307/4613021.
4. Trask, R. L. (2007) Language and Linguistics: The Key Concepts. doi: 10.4324/9780203961131.
5. Key, L. E. B., and Noble, B. P. (2017) Course in General Linguistics. doi: 10.4324/9781912281732.
6. Pearce, J. M. (2013) Animal learning and cognition: An introduction. doi: 10.4324/9781315782911.
7. Wynne, C. D., and Udell, M. A. (2014) “Animal cognition: evolution, behavior and cognition,” Choice Reviews Online, vol. 51, no. 11, doi: 10.5860/choice.51-6185.
8. Range, F., and Virányi, Z. (2011) “Development of gaze following abilities in wolves (canis lupus),” PLoS One, vol. 6, no. 2, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016888.
9. Schwartzkopff, J. (1977) “Auditory communication in lower animals: role of auditory physiology.,” Annual review of psychology, vol. 28. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.28.020177.000425.
10. Kuo, Z. Y. (1960) “Studies on the basic factors in animal fighting: Vi. Inter-species coexistence in birds,” Journal of Genetic Psychology, vol. 97, no. 2, doi: 10.1080/00221325.1960.10534329.
11. Stritih, N., and Kosi, A. Ž. (2017) “Olfactory signaling of aggressive intent in male-male contests of cave crickets (Troglophilus neglectus; Orthoptera: Rhaphidophoridae),” PLoS One, vol. 12, no. 11, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187512.
12. Manser, M. B. (2001) “The acoustic structure of suricates’ alarm calls varies with predator type and the level of response urgency,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 268, no. 1483, doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1773.
13. Simpson, J., and Frisch, K. V. (1969) “The Dance Language and Orientation of Bees,” J Anim Ecol, vol. 38, no. 2, doi: 10.2307/2785.
14. Lacey, E. A. ( 2017) “Mammal Societies,” J Mammal, vol. 98, no. 4, doi: 10.1093/jmammal/gyx078.
15. Goodale, E., and Kotagama, S. W. (2005) “Alarm calling in Sri Lankan mixed-species bird flocks,” Auk, vol. 122, no. 1, doi: 10.1642/0004-8038(2005)122[0108:ACISLM]2.0.CO;2.
16. Leavesley, A. J., and Magrath R. D. (2005) “Communicating about danger: Urgency alarm calling in a bird,” Anim Behav, vol. 70, no. 2, doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.10.017.
17. Schenkel, R. (1967) “Submission: Its features and function in the wolf and dog,” Integr Comp Biol, vol. 7, no. 2, doi: 10.1093/icb/7.2.319.
18. Marler, P. (1961) “The logical analysis of animal communication,” J Theor Biol, vol. 1, no. 3, doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(61)90032-7.
19. Robinson, J. G. (1979) “An Analysis of the Organization of Vocal Communication in the Titi Monkey Callicebus moloch,” Z Tierpsychol, vol. 49, no. 4, doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1979.tb00300.x.
20. Mitani, J. C., and Marler, P. (1989) “A phonological analysis of male gibbon singing behavior,” Behaviour, vol. 109, no. 1–2, doi: 10.1163/156853989X00141.
21. Robinson, J. G. (1984) “Syntactic Structures in the Vocalizations of Wedge-Capped Capuchin Monkeys, Cebus Olivaceus,” Behaviour, vol. 90, no. 1–3, doi: 10.1163/156853984X00551.
22. McFarland, D. (1993) Animal behaviour: Psychobiology, ethology, and evolution, 2nd edition.
23. Gardner, R. A., and Gardner, B. T. (1969) “Teaching Sign Language to a Chimpanzee: A standardized system of gestures provides a means of two-way communication with a chimpanzee,” American Association for the Advancement of Science, vol. 165, no. 3894.
24. Terrace, H. S., Petitto, L. A., Sanders, R. J., and Bever, T. G. (1969) “Can an ape create a sentence?,” Science (1979), vol. 206, no. 4421, doi: 10.1126/science.504995.
25. Pilley, J. W., and Reid, A. K. (2011) “Border collie comprehends object names as verbal referents,” Behavioural Processes, vol. 86, no. 2, doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.11.007.
26. Herman, L. M., Richards, D. G., and Wolz, J. P. (1984) “Comprehension of sentences by bottlenosed dolphins,” Cognition, vol. 16, no. 2, doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(84)90003-9.
27. Zuberbühler, K. (2002) “A syntactic rule in forest monkey communication,” Anim Behav, vol. 63, no. 2, doi: 10.1006/anbe.2001.1914.
Data Availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).
- Volume Title
- Proceedings of the International Conference on Global Politics and Socio-Humanities (ICGPSH 2023)
- ISBN (Print)
- 978-1-83558-113-1
- ISBN (Online)
- 978-1-83558-114-8
- Published Date
- 20 November 2023
- Series
- Communications in Humanities Research
- ISSN (Print)
- 2753-7064
- ISSN (Online)
- 2753-7072
- DOI
- 10.54254/2753-7064/12/20230045
- Copyright
- 20 November 2023
- Open Access
- This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited