Communications in Humanities Research

- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences


Communications in Humanities Research

Vol. 16, 28 November 2023


Open Access | Article

A Review on Mianzi in Interpersonal, Familial, and Business Settings

Minyi Zhang * 1
1 Sendelta International Academy

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Communications in Humanities Research, Vol. 16, 54-58
Published 28 November 2023. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by EWA Publishing
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Citation Minyi Zhang. A Review on Mianzi in Interpersonal, Familial, and Business Settings. CHR (2023) Vol. 16: 54-58. DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/16/20230100.

Abstract

Face is one of the crucial cultural aspects in Chinese society, which can be separated into mianzi and lian. This article will focus on summarizing the concept of mianzi. It is tied to social occasions that require interpersonal communication between individuals and groups: face culture can be found in both workplaces and individual settings. Face culture is adopted as a primary social principle in China and it plays an important role in affecting the languages and behaviors of Chinese people. Thus, being able to understand the meaning of mianzi and behave accordingly is important for corporations that plan to do business in China and individuals who seek connection with Chinese society or culture in any form. This paper will summarize the most important facets of Chinese face culture regarding its role in interpersonal, familial, and business settings, as they are essential to the understanding of face culture.

Keywords

face, mianzi, guanxi, renqing, interpersonal relationship

References

1. Zhou, L., & Zhang, S. (2017). How face as a system of value-constructs operates through the interplay of Mianzi and Lian in Chinese: A corpus-based study. Language Sciences, 64, 152–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2017.08.001

2. Xiaoying Qi. (2011). Face. Journal of Sociology, 47(3), 279–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783311407692

3. Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual essays on face-to-face behavior. Doubleday.

4. Gao, G. (1998). An initial analysis of the effects of face and concern for other in Chinese interpersonal communication. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22(4), 467–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0147-1767(98)00019-4

5. Ivanhoe, P. J. (2020). Losing face. Religions, 11(11), 545. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11110545

6. Tong, L., Toppinen, A., & Wang, L. (2021). Cultural motives affecting tea purchase behavior under two usage situations in China: A study of renqing, Mianzi, collectivism, and man-nature unity culture. Journal of Ethnic Foods, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42779-021-00092-6

7. Juan Li, J., & Su, C. (2007). How face influences consumption - a comparative study of American and Chinese consumers. International Journal of Market Research, 49(2), 237–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/147078530704900207

8. Zhu, Y. (2009). Confucian ethics exhibited in the discourse of Chinese business and Marketing Communication. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(S3), 517–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0299-2

9. Liao, Y., & Bond, M. H. (2010). The dynamics of face loss following interpersonal harm for Chinese and Americans. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022110361774

10. Yen, D. A., Abosag, I., Huang, Y.-A., & Nguyen, B. (2017). Guanxi  Grx ( Ganqing ,  renqing ,  xinren ) and conflict management in Sino-US business relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 66, 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.07.011

11. Tsang, K. K., Ng, T. K., & Wang, Y. (2013). Ingratiation, renqing, mianzi and attraction: a guanxi perspective. Scientific Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 2(2), 95-105.

12. Yen, D. A., Barnes, B. R., & Wang, C. L. (2011). The measurement of guanxi: Introducing the GRX Scale. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(1), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2010.09.014

13. Helm, B. (2021). Friendship. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2021 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/friendship/

14. Finke, E. H. (2016). Friendship: Operationalizing the intangible to improve friendship-based outcomes for individuals with autism spectrum disorder. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 25(4), 654–663. https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_ajslp-15-0042

15. Kleinman, A., & Kleinman, J. (1991). Suffering and its professional transformation: Toward an ethnography of interpersonal experience. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 15(3), 275–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00046540

16. Chao, C. C., & Tian, D (2009). When Mulan meets Romeo: Cultural impact upon the dating scripts, perceptions and behaviors of college students from the United States and Taiwan in their cross-cultural romantic relationships. Chinese Business Review, 08(08). https://doi.org/10.17265/1537-1506/2009.08.005

17. Jian, G., & Ray, G. B. (2016). Chapter 3. In Relationships & Communication in east asian cultures: China, Japan and South Korea. essay, Kendall Hunt.

18. Chua, A. (2011). Why Chinese mothers are superior. The Wall Street Journal, 8, 1-7.

19. Redding, S. G., & Ng, M. (1982). “The role of face” in the organizational perceptions of Chinese managers. Organi- zation Studies, 3, 201-219.

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:

1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.

2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.

3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).

Volume Title
Proceedings of the International Conference on Global Politics and Socio-Humanities
ISBN (Print)
978-1-83558-165-0
ISBN (Online)
978-1-83558-166-7
Published Date
28 November 2023
Series
Communications in Humanities Research
ISSN (Print)
2753-7064
ISSN (Online)
2753-7072
DOI
10.54254/2753-7064/16/20230100
Copyright
28 November 2023
Open Access
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited

Copyright © 2023 EWA Publishing. Unless Otherwise Stated