Communications in Humanities Research
- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences
Vol. 3, 17 May 2023
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
According to Jaggi’s experiment, there is no significant difference in future perception between two cultures with different future-time references. The proposed study will use the same procedure and measurement as Jaggi’s experiment to provide a different perspective that for cultures that vary a lot in future-time references, there might be a significant difference between future perceptions. We hypothesize that cultures that have a weak future-time reference will perceive that the future is closer to the present and that cultures have a strong future-time reference.
Cognition, Future Perception, Future-time Reference
1. Evans, N., & Levinson, S. (2009). The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(5), 429-448. doi:10.1017/S0140525X0999094X
2. Jäggi T, Sato S, Gillioz C, Gygax PM (2022) Is the future near or far depending on the verb tense markers used? An experimental investigation into the effects of the grammaticalization of the future. PLOS ONE 17(1): e0262778. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262778
3. Thoma, D., & Tytus, A. E. (2017). How cross-linguistic differences in the grammaticalization of future time reference influence intertemporal choices. Cognitive Science, 42(3), 974–1000. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12525
4. Chen, M Keith. 2013. "The Effect of Language on Economic Behavior: Evidence from Savings Rates, Health Behaviors, and Retirement Assets." American Economic Review, 103 (2): 690-731. DOI: 10.1257/aer.103.2.690
5. Dahl, O. (2000). The grammar of future time reference in European languages. Empirical Approaches to Language Typology, 6, 309-328
6. Lai, V. T., & Boroditsky, L. (2013). The immediate and chronic influence of spatio-temporal metaphors on the mental representations of time in english, mandarin, and mandarin-english speakers. Frontiers in psychology, 4, 142. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00142
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).