Communications in Humanities Research
- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences
Vol. 26, 03 January 2024
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
The question of human existence and the meaning of life has been a topic of debate for generations. This paper presents the "Three Quadrant Model" as a new approach to understanding the human condition: the temporal, the absurd, and the meaningful states of being. These reflect three phases where humans may live within societal structures, recognize the inherent absurdity of existence, and create their own sense of meaning, respectively. While examining some investigated existential literature and historical philosophical perspectives, the research asserts that humans jump back and forth among these states rather than progressing linearly, as stated by Nietzsche’s three metamorphoses. The three states are characterized by equality, ambiguity, universality, and subjectivity. Ultimately, the model suggests that the quest for life's meaning is subjective, and that no single state is inherently superior to others. The study calls for further exploration into the logical foundations and practical applications of this model.
Human condition, absurdism, existentialism
1. Conway, D. W. (1992). HEIDEGGER, NIETZSCHE, AND THE ORIGINS OF NIHILISM. Journal of Nietzsche Studies, 3, 11–43. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20717561
2. Spelletich, K. (2003). The Myth of Sisyphus. Leonardo, 36(5), 359–359. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1577508
3. Lampert, L. (2012). Thus Spoke Zarathustra. In P. Bishop (Ed.), A Companion to Friedrich Nietzsche: Life and Works (Vol. 114, pp. 201–226). Boydell & Brewer. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7722/j.cttn332r.19
4. Ezigbo, V. I. (2015). Christian Life. In Introducing Christian Theologies II: Voices from Global Christian Communities - Volume 2 (1st ed., pp. 308–340). The Lutterworth Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1ffjnnr.12
5. Murphy, N. R. (1932). The “Simile of Light” in Plato’s Republic. The Classical Quarterly, 26(2), 93–102. http://www.jstor.org/stable/636939
6. Allison, H. E. (1986). Morality and Freedom: Kant’s Reciprocity Thesis. The Philosophical Review, 95(3), 393–425. https://doi.org/10.2307/2185466
7. Zheng, Y. (2001). On Pure Reflection in Sartre’s “Being and Nothingness.” Sartre Studies International, 7(1), 19–42. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23511113
8. Miller, M. A. (2007). Editorial: Sisyphus’s Rock. Change, 39(4), 6–7. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40178050
9. Jappinen, I. (1994). How Many Is “der Übermensch”? Autonomy, Self-Dispersion, and the Eternal Recurrence In Nietzsche’s Also Sprach Zarathustra. Symplokē, 2(2), 149–158. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40550345
10. Field, S. (2012). The Hero’s Journey. In B. Dunham (Ed.), James Cameron: Interviews (pp. 41–49). University Press of Mississippi. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt2tvmmt.13
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).