Communications in Humanities Research

- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences


Communications in Humanities Research

Vol. 10, 31 October 2023


Open Access | Article

Effect Analysis of Digital Communication of Social Media from the Perspective of New Media

Xinyan Chen * 1
1 The University of Melbourne

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Communications in Humanities Research, Vol. 10, 61-66
Published 31 October 2023. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by EWA Publishing
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Citation Xinyan Chen. Effect Analysis of Digital Communication of Social Media from the Perspective of New Media. CHR (2023) Vol. 10: 61-66. DOI: 10.54254/2753-7064/10/20231242.

Abstract

At a time when everyone is using social media, new media gives people a new form of communication, digital communication. In the present digital communication, it has completely different characteristics from traditional media and changes people’s lives imperceptibly. People are no longer focused on the content of newspapers or magazines but more focused on global and personal content. Media is no longer something only professionals can use. Everyone can become a celebrity on the Internet. This essay analyzes the characteristics of digital communication brought by new media and what impression and harm it brings to creators, users, and advertisers, respectively. According to the research findings, social media has the characteristics of diversity, real-time, globalization and personalization. It gives creators a wider range of creative space, makes it easier for advertisers to find their target audience, and allows users to improve their Internet experience. While providing internet convenience, there are also risk of network security.

Keywords

new media, social media, advertiser, digital communication

References

1. Shumaker, R. (2021, March 9). Instagram vs Facebook: The Main Differences You Need to Know HearstBayArea. https://marketing.sfgate.com/blog/the-main-differences-between-facebook-and-instagram-you-need-to-know.

2. Gerhards, C. (2019). Product placement on YouTube: An explorative study on YouTube creators’ experiences with advertisers. Convergence, 25(3), 516-533.

3. Lee, H., & Cho, C. H. (2020). Digital advertising: present and future prospects. International Journal of Advertising, 39(3), 332-341.

4. Winter, S., Maslowska, E., & Vos, A. L. (2021). The effects of trait-based personalization in social media advertising. Computers in Human Behavior, 114, 106525.

5. Schlosser, A. E. (2020). Self-disclosure versus self-presentation on social media. Current opinion in psychology, 31, 1-6.

6. Pleger, L. E., Guirguis, K., & Mertes, A. (2021). Making public concerns tangible: An empirical study of German and UK citizens’ perception of data protection and data security. Computers in Human Behavior, 122, 106830.

7. Barth, S., Ionita, D., & Hartel, P. (2022). Understanding Online Privacy—A Systematic Review of Privacy Visualizations and Privacy by Design Guidelines. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 55(3), 1-37.

8. Weismueller, J., Harrigan, P., Wang, S., & Soutar, G. N. (2020). Influencer endorsements: How advertising disclosure and source credibility affect consumer purchase intention on social media. Australasian marketing journal, 28(4), 160-170.

9. Bruns, A. (2019, July). It’s not the technology, stupid: How the ‘Echo Chamber’and’ Filter Bubble’metaphors have failed us. In International Association for Media and Communication Research Conference (unpublished).

10. Seargeant, P., & Tagg, C. (2019). Social media and the future of open debate: A user-oriented approach to Facebook’s filter bubble conundrum. Discourse, Context & Media, 27, 41-48.

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:

1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.

2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.

3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).

Volume Title
Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Educational Innovation and Philosophical Inquiries
ISBN (Print)
978-1-83558-043-1
ISBN (Online)
978-1-83558-044-8
Published Date
31 October 2023
Series
Communications in Humanities Research
ISSN (Print)
2753-7064
ISSN (Online)
2753-7072
DOI
10.54254/2753-7064/10/20231242
Copyright
31 October 2023
Open Access
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited

Copyright © 2023 EWA Publishing. Unless Otherwise Stated