Communications in Humanities Research
- The Open Access Proceedings Series for Conferences
Communications in Humanities Research
Vol. 23, 20 December 2023
Open
Access | Article
Conversation in the News: Comparing News Coverage of Fukushima Water Dispute in AP and CGTN
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
This research paper examines and compares the coverage of the Fukushima water dispute by the Associated Press (AP) and China Global Television Network (CGTN). The study utilizes framing theory analysis to identify differences arising from biases and priorities in news reporting. The paper analyzes the framing used by both outlets and discusses variations in perspectives on Japan's plan and responsibility. It examines the attributions of different narratives and their impact on the audience in each country. Possible causes for these differences are explored, including geopolitical factors, political polarization, and cultural influences. The findings highlight the significant role of media in shaping public opinion and the importance of understanding the diverse influences that contribute to news coverage. The paper concludes that recognizing these influences and seeking diverse viewpoints is crucial for developing a comprehensive understanding of complex issues. However, it acknowledges the limitations of the analysis and highlights the need to consider editorial biases and commercial interests in news reporting.
Keywords
Fukushima water dispute, framing theory, Associated Press (AP), China Global Television Network (CGTN)
References
1. Liu, Nancy Xiuzhi. News Framing through English-Chinese Translation, 2018.
2. Scheufele, Dietram A., and David Tewksbury. “Framing, Agenda Setting, and Priming: The Evolution of Three Media Effects Models.” Journal of Communication 57, no. 1 (November 9, 2006): 9–20.
3. Bateson, Gregory. “A Theory of Play and Fantasy.” Psychiatric Research Reports, January 1, 1955.
4. Gamson, William A., and Erving Goffman. “Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience.” Contemporary Sociology 4, no. 6 (November 1, 1975): 603.
5. Kang, Jian. “Meiguo zhuliu meiti ruhe tiaozheng dui Hua baodao kuangjia – yi Huaerjie ribao weili” How mainstream media in the United States Adjust the Reporting Framework for China: A Case Study of The Wall Street Journa. Chuanmei 20 (2016): 45-47.
6. Tewksbury, David, and Dietram A. Scheufele. “NEWS FRAMING THEORY AND RESEARCH.” In Routledge EBooks, 33–49, 2009.
7. Valkenburg, Patti M., Holli A. Semetko, and Claes H. De Vreese. “The Effects of News Frames on Readers’ Thoughts and Recall.” Communication Research 26, no. 5 (October 1, 1999): 550–69.
8. Druckman, James N., and Kjersten Nelson. “Framing and Deliberation: How Citizens’ Conversations Limit Elite Influence.” American Journal of Political Science 47, no. 4 (October 1, 2003): 729–45.
9. Sniderman, Paul M., and Sean M. Theriault. “CHAPTER 5: The Structure of Political Argument and the Logic of Issue Framing.” In Princeton University Press EBooks, 133–65, 2004.
10. Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. “Choices, Values, and Frames.” The American Psychologist 39, no. 4 (1984): 341–350.
11. Iyengar, Shanto. Is anyone responsible? how television frames political issues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1991.
12. Schneider, Tamera R., Peter Salovey, Anne Marie Apanovitch, Judith Pizarro, Danielle McCarthy, Janet Zullo, and Alexander J. Rothman. “The Effects of Message Framing and Ethnic Targeting on Mammography Use among Low-Income Women.” Health Psychology 20, no. 4 (July 1, 2001): 256–66. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.20.4.256.
13. Entman, Robert M. "Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm." Journal of Communication 43, no.4 (1993): 51-8.
14. “MOFA: Japan Cannot ‘Whitewash’ Its Nuclear Wastewater Discharge.” CGTN, July 20, 2023. https://news.cgtn.com/news/2023-07-20/MOFA-Japan-cannot-whitewash-its-nuclear-wastewater-discharge-1lAUlhGr1p6/index.html.
15. Mackinder, H. J. “The Geographical Pivot of History.” The Geographical Journal 23, no. 4 (April 1, 1904): 421.
16. Colley, Thomas, and Martin Moore. “News as Geopolitics: China, CGTN and the 2020 US Presidential Election.” The Journal of International Communication 29, no. 1 (September 9, 2022): 82–103.
17. Li, Jingjing. “Video News Framing: The Contribution of Audiovisual Translation.” Translator, November 8, 2022, 1–19.
18. McCright, Aaron M., Chenyang Xiao, and Riley E. Dunlap. “Political Polarization on Support for Government Spending on Environmental Protection in the USA, 1974–2012.” Social science research 48 (2014): 251–260.
19. “AP Gets a Rare Look at Japan’s Fukushima Nuclear Plant as It Prepares to Release Radioactive Water | AP News.” AP News, July 14, 2023. https://apnews.com/article/japan-fukushima-nuclear-plant-water-release-cf6f2b99df9cea91abc7b2ad2d23d9fd.
20. Banks, Antoine J., Ernesto Calvo, David Karol, and Shibley Telhami. “#PolarizedFeeds: Three Experiments on Polarization, Framing, and Social Media.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 26, no. 3 (July 23, 2020): 609–34.
21. Fearon, Thomas, and Usha M. Rodrigues. “The Dichotomy of China Global Television Network’s News Coverage.” Pacific Journalism Review 25, no. 1 & 2 (July 31, 2019): 102–21.
Data Availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).
- Volume Title
- Proceedings of the International Conference on Global Politics and Socio-Humanities
- ISBN (Print)
- 978-1-83558-241-1
- ISBN (Online)
- 978-1-83558-242-8
- Published Date
- 20 December 2023
- Series
- Communications in Humanities Research
- ISSN (Print)
- 2753-7064
- ISSN (Online)
- 2753-7072
- DOI
- 10.54254/2753-7064/23/20230764
- Copyright
- 20 December 2023
- Open Access
- This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited