Vol. 2, 03 March 2023
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
While translation is always indispensable in international communication and exchange, the value of translators always seems to be underestimated. As an intermediary between the source and target language, translators can and should play their subjectivity in the translation practice. The translators’ subjectivity can be further interpreted from a relevance theoretical approach. This theory believes that translators are responsible for leading the way of comprehension of the audience by building a most identical cognitive environment and avoiding misunderstanding. Translators also play the main role in the two ostensive-inferential communication processes between the author and the translator and between the translator and the audience. Specifically, this paper uses the relevance theory as a foundation to analyze how translators’ subjectivity is manifested in subtitle translation. It picks out three examples from the lines of a popular American sitcom and finds out that translators do use amplification, conversion, and other strategies to make the ostension in the target language more acceptable for the Chinese audience. From the theoretical basis, the author also gives suggestions for optimizing the translation to retain the same comic effect.
practice, relevance, translation;, theory;, translation, subtitle, subjectivity;, translators’
1. Hu Miao (2005). The Subjectivity of the Translator from the Perspective of Relevance Theory. Shanghai International Studies University. Master’s thesis
2. Dan Sperber and Deirdre Wilson (1986). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell
3. H.P. Grice (1975). Logic and Conversation. Syntax and semantics 3: Speech arts. pp. 41-58
4. Ernst-August Gutt (1991). Translation and Relevance: Cognition and Context. Oxford: Blackwell
5. Deirdre Wilson and Dan Sperber (2002). Relevance Theory. UCL Psychology and Language Sciences
6. Francisco Yus. (2016). Humour and Relevance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
7. Susan H. Foster-Cohen (2004). Relevance Theory, Action Theory, and second language communication strategies. Second Language Research. 20,3: 289-302
8. Philip W. Goodwin (2013). Translating the English Bible: From Relevance to Deconstruction. The Lutterworth Press.
9. Gene L. Green (2010). Relevance Theory and Theological Interpretation: Thoughts on Metarepresentation. Journal of Theological Interpretation. 4,1: 75–90.
10. Ran Yongping (2002). The Development and Application of Relevance Theory. Journal of the Guangdong University of Foreign Studies. (1):12-17
11. Zhao Yan, Xiang Mingyou (2018). Exploring the Frontiers of Relevance Theory. Modern Foreign Languages. 41,1: 130-140
12. Bu Aiping (2012). On the Translation of Chinese-English Aphorism Based on Relevance Theory. Shanghai Journal of Translators. 1: 70-73
13. Wangting, Zhang Tian (2017). The application and development of relevance theory in the translation of tea. Tea in Fujian. 39(12):273-274
14. Ghassemiazghandi, M, Tengku-Sepora, TM (2020). Translation Strategies of Humor in Subtitling. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities. 28,2: 939-955
15. Horbacauskiene, J, Kasperaviciene, R, Petroniene, S (2016). Issues of culture specific item translation in subtitling. Meaning in Translation: Illusion of Precision. 231: 223-228
16. Pedersen Jan (2018). How metaphors are rendered in subtitles. Target – International Journal of Translation Studies. 29,3: 416-439
17. Bywood Lindsay, Georgakopoulou Panayota, Etchegoyhen Thierry (2017). Embracing the threat: machine translation as a solution for subtitling. Perspectives – Studies in Translation Theory and Practice. 25,3: 492-508
18. Łukasz Bogucki (2004). The Constraint of Relevance in Subtitling. The Journal of Specialised Translation.
19. Zhang Lijun (2013). Research of the translation of movie subtitles from the perspective of relevance theory. Film Literature. 16: 162-163
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. Authors who publish this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open Access Instruction).